SpeechMap.AI is a public research project that measures AI censorship and refusal rates across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and other language models. It records refusal rates for each model release and publishes a free-speech leaderboard tracking changes over time.
Eqbench3
EQ-Bench 3 is a multi-turn emotional intelligence benchmark for language models. It presents role-play scenarios and analysis tasks requiring empathy, insight and social skill, and an auxiliary judge model scores or pairwise-compares the outputs. An MIT-licensed repository with a readme, results and data folders, it includes rubric scoring and pairwise ELO analysis options.
Uses
- multi-turn emotional intelligence benchmark Source: github.com
Links
Tags
-
0SpeechMap.AI is a public research project that measures AI censorship and refusal rates across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and other language models. It records refusal rates for each model release and publishes a free-speech leaderboard tracking changes over time.
-
0LLM Explorer is a directory of open-source language models and AI agents. It lists 150 AI agents and 64,811 open-source large and small language models, grouped into categories with benchmarks and analytics.
-
0Artificial Analysis provides comparison and analysis of AI models and API hosting providers. It offers independent benchmarks across performance metrics including quality, price, output speed and latency, along with an intelligence index and cost-per-task measures.
-
0
Models.dev is an open-source database that lists AI model specifications, pricing and features. It covers models from multiple providers with details such as context length, modalities and open or closed availability.
-
0VoxelBench provides machine-learning models, research, training resources, or evaluation tools.
-
0SimpleBench is a multiple-choice text benchmark for LLMs with over 200 questions covering spatio-temporal reasoning, social intelligence and trick questions. Its report states a non-specialized human baseline of 83.7 percent from a small sample of nine participants.
Community notes
Reviews and discussion
No reviews yet
Be the first to share how this project worked for you.
Join the discussion
Sign in with a verified account to leave a review or join the discussion.
Sign in to review